Fellow reviewers enjoy a vital role in the scientific posting
Their professional product reviews and suggestions guide editors inside their choices and you will ensure that composed research is valid, rigorous, and you will credible. Writers see peer reviewers primarily because of the during the-breadth knowledge of the topic matter otherwise methods of the task he’s requested to check. It assistance was invaluable and you can irreplaceable. Fellow writers was accountable for the precision and you may views shown during the their profile, while the peer review process works into the a concept away from common faith anywhere between authors, writers and you will publishers. Despite rapid advances, generative AI units have considerable restrictions: they could use up all your upwards-to-day studies that can write absurd, biased otherwise false advice. Manuscripts also can is sensitive otherwise proprietary information which ought to perhaps not become common beyond your fellow remark processes. Therefore we query one, whenever you are Springer Characteristics examines getting the peer reviewers which have access to secure AI equipment, fellow writers do not upload manuscripts for the generative AI systems.
Or no a portion of the review of the states built in the manuscript was in in any manner supported by an enthusiastic AI equipment, i ask fellow writers to claim the usage of such products transparently in the peer opinion statement.
Citations
Look articles and you can low-research stuff (elizabeth.g. Advice, Feedback, and you can Comments posts) need to mention compatible and you https://kissbridesdate.com/fr/asian-single-solution-avis/ can associated books meant for the new claims made. Way too much self-admission, coordinated work certainly numerous article writers in order to collectively thinking-mention, gratuitous and you will so many solution out-of blogs wrote in the log to help you that papers could have been registered, and every other kind of ticket control are poor.
Ticket control will result in the content becoming rejected, and could become said so you’re able to authors’ institutions. Also, any effort from the peer-reviewers otherwise writers so you’re able to remind eg methods are advertised by people on journalist.
- Article authors must look into the next guidelines when preparing their manuscript:
- One statement in the manuscript that hinges on external sourced elements of pointers (we.elizabeth. not the newest authors’ very own the newest information otherwise findings otherwise standard knowledge) is to fool around with a citation.
- Article authors will be prevent mentioning derivations out-of completely new works. Eg, they have to cite the initial works as opposed to a review post that alludes to exclusive really works.
- People would be to make sure that their citations is particular (we.age. they have to ensure the ticket aids the newest report manufactured in their manuscript and cannot misrepresent yet another performs by mentioning they in the event the it generally does not hold the point the new article authors need to create).
- Article authors shouldn’t mention supply that they have not read.
- Writers cannot preferentially mention their particular or their friends’, peers’, otherwise institution’s guides.
- Authors would be to end mentioning performs only from 1 nation.
- Writers should avoid using a too much quantity of citations to support some point.
- Preferably, people will be cite offer which have undergone peer comment in which it is possible to.
- Article authors shouldn’t cite advertising or advertorial topic.
Preprint sharing and you may admission
BMC periodicals remind posting of preprints out of number 1 search manuscripts to your preprint host of your own authors’ possibilities, authors’ or organization websites, and you will open correspondence anywhere between scientists whether into the society preprint server otherwise preprint posting comments networks.
Preprints is actually defined as a keen author’s version of research manuscript just before authoritative peer opinion within a log, that’s deposited for the a public machine (once the discussed during the Preprints for the life sciences. Research 352, 899901; 2016); preprints are released any moment from inside the peer remark processes. Post away from preprints isnt believed previous book and will not threaten planning from the BMC journals. Manuscripts published towards preprint server won’t be considered whenever deciding the advance available with a study concerned at a good BMC record.
BMC possess hitched having Browse Rectangular ( BMC enjoys a big part need for Lookup Rectangular) to include For the Opinion, a record-included service to possess preprint sharing, support experts all over all teams i are designed to share their search early. Writers submission to a few BMC publications will be able to in public places display information about its fellow feedback as a consequence of Inside the Remark. Standard details about Within the Comment during the BMC together with Search Rectangular preprint program can be acquired here that is where .